| EMR Options |
EMR VS EHR
Some professionals have defined the terminology like this;
EMR: "The electronic record of health-related information on an individual that is created, gathered, managed, and consulted by licensed clinicians and staff from a single organization who are involved in the individual’s health and care"
EHR: "The aggregate electronic record of health-related information on an individual that is created and gathered cumulatively across more than one health care organization and is managed and consulted by licensed clinicians and staff involved in the individual’s health and care"
The above definition is entirely correct. Defining the term EMR or EHR is easy in order to increase the value of the product itself. But any vendor that proposes EMR & EHR has the same vision of the EHR dream, which is still in its infancy to achieve the full and real EHR goal.
Most physicians and IT people from hospitals, and big practices were used to the term EMR, which stands for Electronic Medical Records. In order to go beyond the adopted EMR term, many of these same professionals went further and wanted to create a new terminology that would demonstrate more functionality beyond the EMR. By then, the EMR had enough functionality needed for the practice and for the practice only, hence the EHR terminology was created. The EHR or Electronic Health Records was supposed to be richer in functionality, a lot more than what EMR was. EHR was supposed to interconnect providers, service providers, connections to imaging systems from other providers, hospitals and many more connections with other EHR's. The EMR itself was heading in the right direction, and nowadays there are better EMR's interconnected than EHR's companies that started with the EHR vision.
The market itself has also confused the terminology: vendors, government, hospitals, advertisement companies, consultants, and physicians have propagated fancy words to describe the same EMR functionality, and it was a matter of time to have a more robust EMR. The EHR is just the fancy word for EMR, and EMR is just the fundamental origin of the Electronic Health Records.
With the terminology EHR, it was supposed to be a collection of information from many providers by pulling out information from many different data sources or places, where the information can be seen together in one single view and be able to have better assessments for patients.
The reality is that the technology does not exist as of the time of writing this article, some may say that they have the technology in their practice because they are a multi-specialty practice and are able to see other physician notes on the same screen; the EHR fundamental idea is not based on internal shared communications among physicians, but external. Most EMR development companies now have to use both terms in their marketing because they do not want to loose the opportunity to be seen by physicians searching for the term EMR or EHR. The fact is that there is not such EMR vs EHR, comparison. Companies are evolving and presenting more options on their products, eventually satisfying the dream of having providers connecting together to provide the best assessment possible for patients.
EncounterNotes provides you with the following EMR Software Products, Medical Billing Service, and technology Services
Medical Software | Practice Management Software | Medical Scheduling Software | Telephony Reminder Software - ReminderPro | Medical Billing Software | Electronic Medical Records Software | EMR Software / EHR Software | Telephony Lab System | Medical Billing Service
For more Information
Feel free to contact us so we can provide you with more insight information. Remember that we are consultants and not sales people, so the conversation will be more straight to your point not to ours. If you do not have time right now, just leave us your information and we will call you at the time you specify in the free demo request form


